Hicks v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Per curiam
In this consolidated appeal from the Superior Court, defendants contend that the statutes proscribing prostitution, 11 Del.C. § 1342, 1 and related conduct, patronizing a prostitute, 11 Del.C. § 1343, 2 and promoting prostitution in the first degree, 11 Del.C. § 1353, 3 second degree, 11 Del.C. § 1352, 4 and third degree, 11 Del.C. § 1351, 5 are violative of their state and federal constitutional rights of privacy and equal protection.
These questions were properly considered by the Trial Courts in separate Opinions. See State v. Hicks, Del.Super., 360 A.2d 150 (1976); Blake, et a 1. v. State,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. HicksSuperior Court of Delaware · 1976
- Blake v. StateSuperior Court of Delaware · 1975
3Cited by9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. FinneganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- State v. J. K.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1977
- City of Madison v. SchultzCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
- Holy Cross Hospital of Silver Spring, Inc. v. Maryland Employment Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Cherry v. KochNew York Supreme Court · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.