Legal Opinion
State v. Hicks
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided June 24, 1976PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’HARA, Judge.
Defendant has moved for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 35(a). Defendant was charged with criminal solicitation (for prostitution) in the third degree, 11 Del.C. § 501, conspiracy (to commit prostitution) in the second degree, 11 Del.C. § 512, and with promoting prostitution in the second degree, 11 Del.C. § 1352. He was convicted of all three offenses in this Court. On appeal the Delaware Supreme Court refused to hear argument on the question of the constitutionality of the underlying prostitution statutes inasmuch as the matter had not been presented to or considered…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
- Commonwealth v. FinneganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- State v. J. K.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1977
- City of Madison v. SchultzCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
- Hicks v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.