Legal Opinion
Padou v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 17, 2010No. 09-CV-390PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REID, Associate Judge:
Appellants, Abigail and Don Padou, acting pro se, filed an amended complaint alleging, in part, that the District violated *288their First Amendment constitutional rights by selectively removing their posters from utility poles or public lampposts. We are constrained to reverse the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the District, and we remand this case with instructions to afford the parties an opportunity to conduct discovery, followed by further proceedings (dispositive motions or trial).
FACTUAL SUMMARY
As the record reveals, the events which led to the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Clark v. Community for Creative Non-ViolenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Hill v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pietrangelo v. Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr, LLPDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Pajic v. Foote Properties, LLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- JAYVON R. WHITE v. UNITED STATES.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- Jordan v. JordanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Karim v. GunnDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.