Legal Opinion · Dissent

Pattison v. W.W. Grainger, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 2008No. 2007-1345Published

1DissentLundberg Stratton, J.

{¶ 23} I respectfully dissent from the majority’s reading of Civ.R. 41(A) because I believe that the majority’s interpretation is unworkable, puts the plaintiff in an untenable position, and does not resolve the problem of piecemeal litigation as it purports to. I believe that Civ.R. 41(A) permits a party to dismiss fewer than all the claims in a multicount complaint, thereby creating a final, appealable judgment as to any other claim or claims that have been adjudicated. Alternatively, I would hold that courts should treat a Civ.R. 41(A) notice of dismissal of the remaining claims in a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clayton Coffey v. Foamex L.P., and Recticel Foam CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  2. Denham v. City of New CarlisleOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Management Investors v. United Mine Workers Of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
  4. Eiland v. Coldwell Banker Hunter RealtyOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Boyce v. Augusta-Richmond CountyDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API