City of San Diego v. Cuyamaca Water Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.
In this action to condemn real property for public use, compensation and damages were assessed by a jury’s verdict, which was returned and filed on the ninth day of July, 1925. Other issues relating to the action were tried before the court without a jury, and on those issues findings of fact were signed by the judge and filed on the twenty-second day of August, 1925. These findings, while they recite that an order had been made directing that the issues involving compensation and damages be submitted to a jury, did not directly include any statement of the amount of compensation and damages…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sherwin v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
- Aspegren Co., Inc. v. Sherman, Swan Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
- County of Los Angeles v. Rindge Co.California Court of Appeal · 1924
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of San Diego v. Cuyamaca Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
- Luce v. Clear Lake Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Mardesich v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931