Legal Opinion

City of San Diego v. Cuyamaca Water Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 10, 1927No. Docket No. 5353PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.

In this action to condemn real property for public use, compensation and damages were assessed by a jury’s verdict, which was returned and filed on the ninth day of July, 1925. Other issues relating to the action were tried before the court without a jury, and on those issues findings of fact were signed by the judge and filed on the twenty-second day of August, 1925. These findings, while they recite that an order had been made directing that the issues involving compensation and damages be submitted to a jury, did not directly include any statement of the amount of compensation and damages…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sherwin v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Aspegren Co., Inc. v. Sherman, Swan Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
  3. County of Los Angeles v. Rindge Co.California Court of Appeal · 1924

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of San Diego v. Cuyamaca Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Luce v. Clear Lake Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. Mardesich v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API