Luce v. Clear Lake Water Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
As a result of an inverse condemnation suit, plaintiff landowners secured an “interlocutory” judgment on July 14, 1967, declaring defendant water company entitled to a decree of condemnation, declaring plaintiffs’ entitlement to judgment for $8,501.60 plus interest from September 30, 1960, and ordering a final decree of condemnation upon defendant’s deposit of the money in court. The water company appealed, but put up no money or security. Plaintiffs applied to the trial court for an order requiring deposit in court, and on June 6, 1968, the trial court filed such an order. The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Citizens Utilities Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Tobin v. CasausCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Colusa v. Superior Court of County of GlennCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- Estate of ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Bank of America v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Buchwald v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- F & L FARM CO. v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998