Legal Opinion
Duett v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided February 11, 2022No. 2:19-cv-01917Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 6 AT SEATTLE 7 MARY DUETT, 8 Plaintiff, CASE NO. 2:19-cv-01917-LK 9 v. ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL 10 STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, 11 Defendant. 12 This case involves a first-party insurance dispute between Plaintiff Mary Duett and 13 Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”). State Farm’s 14 Motion to Compel (Dkt. 27) has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 15 Rule 72(a) and 28 U.S.C. § 686(b)(1)(A).1 At issue in State Farm’s motion…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Phillips v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Surfvivor Media, Inc. Peter S. Deptula v. Survivor Productions CBS Broadcasting Inc. CBS Worldwide, Inc. Wpc Brands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. RicheyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Cable & Computer Technology, Inc. v. Lockheed Saunders, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1997
- Lexington Insurance v. SwansonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2007