Legal Opinion

Elmhorst v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1964No. 4334PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

LEWIS, J.

Plaintiff-appellant, the widow of Ernest Elmhorst, a retired employee of Gaspro, Ltd., brought this action as the named beneficiary of his life insurance under the provisions of a group policy issued by defendant-appellee, hereinafter referred to as “Prudential.” The question at issue was whether the group policy continued to cover Elmhorst up to the date of his death, October 25, 1958. Verdict was directed for Prudential.

The policy was issued effective February 21, 1938, and amended in its entirety effective February 28, 1957. It named as the policyholder…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hawthorne v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Watson v. BrowerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  3. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. McDanielCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  4. Terry v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951
  5. Rothermel v. Aetna Life Ins. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lecker v. General American Life Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Wells v. Wilbur B. Driver Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
  3. Elmhorst v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaHawaii Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Opinion No. 72-307 (1972) Ag, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API