Legal Opinion

Russell v. Allen

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 4, 1973No. 9201PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOGAN, Judge.

In this case, the trial court has permanently restrained and enjoined the defendant from going upon the plaintiffs’ premises “and removing or attempting to remove therefrom any of the mining equipment located thereon”. We have reviewed the case upon the law and the evidence, as required by Rule 73.01(d)1, and bearing in mind that we should affirm the judgment unless our review of the entire evidence leaves us with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed, United States v. United States Gypsum Co., 333 U.S. 364, 394-395, 68 S.Ct. 525, 541-542 [14] [15]…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Crosswhite v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  3. Schlanger v. SimonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  4. Barnhart v. RipkaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
  5. Linscomb v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gibson v. Reliable Chevrolet, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Herron v. BarnardMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Herron v. WhitesideMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Wilson v. Wheeler Farms, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Maude v. General Motors Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API