Legal Opinion

State v. Parry

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided February 1, 2018No. 20160196-CAPublished

1Opinion of the Court

POHLMAN, Judge:

¶1 Marcus Wayne Parry appeals the district court's order finding him competent to stand trial. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

¶2 The State brought criminal charges against Parry for rape, tampering with a witness, and obstructing justice. Parry's counsel then filed a petition for inquiry into Parry's competency to proceed in the matter of the pending criminal charges. After determining that the petition raised a "bona fide doubt as to [Parry's] competency to stand trial," the district court granted the petition and ordered that mental health experts examine Parry. One expert opined that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. LaffertyUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. ArguellesUtah Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Wallace v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Madsen v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.Utah Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State v. WolfCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API