Legal Opinion

State v. Arguelles

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 2003No. 970364, 970366PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED OPINION

DURHAM, Chief Justice:

¶ 1 This case presents the unusual situation wherein a capital defendant seeks the death penalty for his crimes. The defendant, Roberto Y. Arguelles (“Arguelles”), pled guilty to four counts of aggravated murder. During the penalty phase, Arguelles waived his right to counsel, acknowledged that he felt the death penalty was the appropriate punishment for him, and presented limited mitigating evidence. The court sentenced defendant to death. Now before us on mandatory statutory appeal, the court assistant1 claims on Arguelles’s behalf that the death…

2Cases cited91 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. State v. LowUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. MaestasUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Soto v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Archuleta v. GaletkaUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  5. State v. WorwoodUtah Supreme Court · 2007

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API