State v. Arguelles
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION
DURHAM, Chief Justice:
¶ 1 This case presents the unusual situation wherein a capital defendant seeks the death penalty for his crimes. The defendant, Roberto Y. Arguelles (“Arguelles”), pled guilty to four counts of aggravated murder. During the penalty phase, Arguelles waived his right to counsel, acknowledged that he felt the death penalty was the appropriate punishment for him, and presented limited mitigating evidence. The court sentenced defendant to death. Now before us on mandatory statutory appeal, the court assistant1 claims on Arguelles’s behalf that the death…
2Cases cited91 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- State v. LowUtah Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. MaestasUtah Supreme Court · 2012
- Soto v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
- Archuleta v. GaletkaUtah Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. WorwoodUtah Supreme Court · 2007
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.