Legal Opinion

May v. Sexton

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1949No. 4977PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THALHEIMER, Superior Judge.

The appellants are two out of three creditors who brought separate actions against the appellees and W. Frank Johnson, also known as W. F. Johnson, and Jane Doe Johnson, his wife, alleging them to be partners in the operation of a cement brick manufacturing business. No service of process being obtained upon the Johnsons, the actions were prosecuted against the appellees alone. On stipulation of the parties the three actions were consolidated and the claims of these appellants fixed at $402.94 and $327.10, respectively. After a trial to the court without a jury, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Blackford v. NeavesArizona Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Shannon Copper Co. v. PotterArizona Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Warren v. MosherArizona Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Eastlick v. Hayward Lumber & Investment Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Anderson v. Alabam Freight LinesArizona Supreme Court · 1946

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Parker v. Northern Mixing Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Canyon State Canners, Inc. v. HooksArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Mercer v. VinsonArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Valley Nat. Bank of Phoenix v. SiebrandArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Foote v. GerberArizona Supreme Court · 1959

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API