Legal Opinion
Eastlick v. Hayward Lumber & Investment Co.
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided February 6, 1928No. Civ. No. 2650PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcALISTER, J.
— This action was instituted by the Hayward Lumber & Investment Company, a corporation, against E. B. Keelen, doing business as the Keelen Sales Company, and Jack Eastlick and W. II. Howe, doing business under the firm name of Howe & Eastlick. The purpose of the suit is to collect three notes, and, the plaintiff having prevailed at the trial, the defendant Eastlick appeals.
It appears that the Hayward Lumber & Investment Company, a California corporation, entered this state in 1917 for the purpose of engaging in the lumber business in the towns of Yuma and Somerton. At that time it made T. L.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. Chicot County Cotton-Alfalfa Farm Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
3Cited by7 opinions
- National Union Indemnity Co. v. Bruce Bros.Arizona Supreme Court · 1934
- Mercer v. VinsonArizona Supreme Court · 1959
- May v. SextonArizona Supreme Court · 1949
- Creamery Package Mfg. Co. v. Cheyenne Ice Cream Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1940
- McMillan v. Pawnee Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.