State v. Christiansen
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWarden, J.
Defendant appeals convictions for manufacture of a controlled substance, ORS 475.992(1), and possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(4). He was convicted in a trial to the court on stipulated facts. We affirm.
Defendant challenges the sufficiency of an affidavit which Oregon State Police detective Reeg used to obtain a warrant to search his home. The affidavit is based primarily on information obtained from a named informant, Keitz, and contains two defects which are serious, but not fatal: it uses the results of a search previously declared illegal, and it contains information that…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. VillagranOregon Supreme Court · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. EvoniukCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986