Legal Opinion

State v. Christiansen

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 16, 1986No. 84 1543-C-2; 84 1544-C-2; CA A36022; CA A36023PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWarden, J.

Defendant appeals convictions for manufacture of a controlled substance, ORS 475.992(1), and possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(4). He was convicted in a trial to the court on stipulated facts. We affirm.

Defendant challenges the sufficiency of an affidavit which Oregon State Police detective Reeg used to obtain a warrant to search his home. The affidavit is based primarily on information obtained from a named informant, Keitz, and contains two defects which are serious, but not fatal: it uses the results of a search previously declared illegal, and it contains information that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. State v. VillagranOregon Supreme Court · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. EvoniukCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API