Legal Opinion

Holmes v. District Court of Summit County

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided August 29, 1983No. 83SA221PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEIGHBORS, Justice.

This is an original proceeding filed pursuant to C.A.R. 21. The petitioners seek to prohibit the respondent district court from proceeding against them in two criminal cases which were commenced after the court granted the district attorney’s request to file direct informations. The informa-tions charge the petitioners with the identical crimes that were dismissed by the county court for lack of probable cause following a preliminary hearing. We issued a rule to show cause and now make the rule absolute.

I

The petitioners, James Holmes (Holmes) and Travis Kellner (Kellner),…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hunter v. District Ct. in & for Twentieth Jud. Dist.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  2. People v. Superior Court (Mendella)California Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Maestas v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  4. People v. QuinnSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  5. Kuypers v. DISTRICT COURT FORFOURTH JUD. DIST.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. BrickeyUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Kartes v. KartesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  3. People v. ConnellySupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  4. Wood v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  5. People v. FisherSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API