Hulme v. Levis-Zuloski Mercantile Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Appeal from Potter County Court; W. M. Jeter, Judge. Action by the Levis-Zuloski Mercantile Company against W. E. Hulme and others. From a judgment for plaintiff and against defendant J. M. Clayton, said defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.
Appellee filed this suit against W. E. Hulme and wife, Bertha Hulme, and J. M. Clayton to cover the amount of an open account for goods sold and delivered them, and alleged that the defendant J. M. Clayton agreed to pay for and guaranteed in writing the full payment of the amount. Before the trial, appellee took a nonsuit as to W. E. Hulme and wife, and the cause proceeded to judgment before the court, without a jury, against J. M. Clayton alone.
The first assignment of error challenges the sufficiency of the account, complaining that it is not properly itemized, does not fully give the dates…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Kirby Lumber Co. v. ChambersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906
- Henry Rusher v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- P. W. Gallagher & Co. v. Goldfrank, Frank & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1890
- Bynum v. HobbsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Wood v. Canfield Paper Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1928
- Williamsburg Nursing Home, Inc. v. Paramedics, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1970
- Southern Nat. Bank of Houston, Tex. v. Tri Financial Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1970
- Foster Lumber Co. v. RodgersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Commonwealth Nat. Bank of Dallas v. GoldsteinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.