Legal Opinion
U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. Pia
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 22, 2013Published
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the plaintiff appeals from an order and interlocutory judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Nicolai, J.), dated October 19, 2011, which, inter alia, after a framed-issue hearing, is in favor of the defendants and against it on the defendants’ counterclaim for rescission of the subject loan agreement pursuant to the *992Federal Truth in Lending Act (15 USC § 1601 et seq.) and awarded attorney’s fees to the defendants.
Ordered that the order and interlocutory judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly determined, after, inter…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rowland v. Novus Financial Corp.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1996
- Brodo v. Bankers Trust Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- Fairbanks Capital Corp. v. JenkinsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002
- Miranda v. Universal Financial Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
- Frese v. EMPIRE FINANCIAL SERVICESDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010