Legal Opinion
Castro v. State, Department of Health & Welfare
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided May 22, 1981No. 13587PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McFADDEN, Justice.
Appellant Jose Castro seeks review of an order of the district court affirming an order of the magistrate division of that court which terminated his parental rights to his minor child, Leticia Castro, upon a finding that the child had been abused. I.C. § 16-2005(b). Appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the court’s order of termination. After reviewing the record, the court is of the opinion that the order of termination must be affirmed.
The Idaho Department of Health and Welfare on March 2, 1979, filed a petition for termination of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Blore v. John Z.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
- Corrigan v. ColstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Flakoll v. HalamudaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- State Ex Rel. Child v. ClouseIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
- Yearsley v. YearsleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Tanner v. State, Department of Health & WelfareIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
- Doe v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
- Matter of MLMWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
- Crum v. State Department of Health & WelfareIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
- Thompson v. ThompsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.