Legal Opinion
State v. Holmes
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 5, 2003No. AC 22799PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLYNN, J.
The defendant, Robert Holmes, appeals from the judgment of conviction rendered following his plea of guilty of assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-59. On appeal, the defendant claims that he is entitled to plain error review on the ground that his plea of guilty was not entered knowingly and voluntarily because (1) the trial court failed to advise him that he enjoyed a right against self-incrimination and that by pleading guilty he was waiving that right and (2) the totality of the circumstances illustrates that he did not understand fully the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- State v. BadgettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. BrowneConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Feen v. New England Benefit Companies, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- State v. HeyligerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- State v. SchlosserConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
- State v. HolmesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003