State v. Heyliger
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WEST, J.
The defendant, Reina Heyliger, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered by the trial court, after she entered guilty pleas under the Alford doctrine 1 to conspiracy to commit robbery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-48 and 53a-134 (a) (2) 2 and larceny in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-122. 3 The issue in this appeal is whether, at the time she entered her plea, the defendant was apprised adequately of the nature of the criminal charges against her consistent with the federal constitutional requirement that a guilty…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- State v. ReidSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. MoyeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- State v. KokkinakosConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- State v. YoungConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- State v. ClaudioConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010