Legal Opinion

Ranciato v. Nelson

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 31, 1995No. 13363PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

In this appeal from the denial of an application for a writ of habeas corpus, the petitioner, Raymond Ranciato, challenges his impending extradition to California pursuant to General Statutes § 54-159.1 The gist of his four claims is that the trial court improperly determined that sufficient facts existed to justify its findings that the extradition documents charging the defendant with a crime stated probable cause and that the documents were authentic.

“We first consider our scope of review. Tn a habeas corpus appeal, this court may not disturb underlying historical facts found by the habeas…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Siano v. WardenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  2. Biggs v. WardenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
  3. Veal v. WardenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  4. McKnight v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Westport Taxi Service, Inc. v. Westport Transit DistrictSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. Evans v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  3. Ranciato v. NelsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API