Legal Opinion · Dissent

Jewish Board of Guardians v. Grumman Allied Industries Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 7, 1983Published

1Dissent

Fein and Alexander, JJ.,

dissent in a memorandum by Alexander, J., as follows: I would affirm the judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff, Jewish Board of Guardians, against the defendants Grumman and Biuso, as well as the indemnification judgment in favor of third-party plaintiff Biuso against third-party defendant Auriga. I would also affirm the order denying the motion of the defendant Grumman for leave to amend its answer. While, as the majority observes, an agreed-upon division of function and duty among the parties appears from the contract documents, the trial record makes it clear…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Levine v. Shell Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Harriss v. TamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  3. Birdsall v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  4. Williams v. New York University HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  5. Emery v. Depot Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API