Jewish Board of Guardians v. Grumman Allied Industries Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Fein and Alexander, JJ.,
dissent in a memorandum by Alexander, J., as follows: I would affirm the judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff, Jewish Board of Guardians, against the defendants Grumman and Biuso, as well as the indemnification judgment in favor of third-party plaintiff Biuso against third-party defendant Auriga. I would also affirm the order denying the motion of the defendant Grumman for leave to amend its answer. While, as the majority observes, an agreed-upon division of function and duty among the parties appears from the contract documents, the trial record makes it clear…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Levine v. Shell Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Harriss v. TamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Birdsall v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Williams v. New York University HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Emery v. Depot Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1981