Gordon v. Pappas

I am unable to assent to the views of the majority.

The verdict was not right as a matter of law. The evidence presented a fact question as to whether Pappas, Jr., was negligent. Likewise, it was a fact question whether the collision was caused solely by Hall’s negligence, consisting of Ms violations of M. S. A. 169.50 in parking Ms autotruck at night on the pavement without á lighted “rear lamp” plainly visible from a distance 500 feet to the rear, and of § 169.75 in so parMng his autotruck without “immediately” setting out flares 100 feet to the rear, 100 feet in advance, and one on the…