Legal Opinion

O'Neill v. Caledonian Ins. Co., of Edinburgh

California Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1913No. S.F. No. 6179PublishedCited by 10 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

The above-entitled actions were brought upon policies of insurance to recover of the respective defendants the proportions due from them, respectively, of a loss to plaintiff from a fire which destroyed his property covered by the policies. By agreement the causes were tried together. A verdict was returned for the plaintiff, stating separately the amount of recovery from each defendant, and judgment was given accordingly. The defendants have each appealed from the judgment and also from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

The most important point urged in the argument is the contention…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Arnold v. American Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Yoch v. Home Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Price v. Zim Israel Navigation Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  2. Faris v. American National Assurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
  3. Meyerstein v. Great American InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. Oakland Stadium v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, LondonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Cronenwett v. Iowa Underwriters of the Dubuque Fire & Marine InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API