Legal Opinion
Voitier v. Guidry
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided December 16, 2014No. 14-CA-276PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FREDERICKA HOMBERG WICKER, Judge.
| ¡.Appellant-attorney, Cynthia Samuel, appeals the trial court’s judgment imposing sanctions against her pursuant to La. C.C.P. art. 863 and denying her motion for sanctions against appellees and their counsel. For the following reasons, we affirm that portion of the trial court judgment imposing sanctions and attorney fees against Ms. Samuel under La. C.C.P. art. 863. However, because we find Ms. Samuel — who is not a party in this matter — does not have a right of action for sanctions against appellees or their counsel, we vacate that portion of the trial…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Copenhaver v. John Bonura & Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
- Associated Motors, Inc. v. BurkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
- Royal Ins. v. Romain Motor Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
- Langley v. Petro Star Corp. of La.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
- Bridges v. Autozone Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lockett v. UV Insurance Risk Retention Group, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- Thiel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- Succession of Leone Ittmann FlakeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2024
- Thiel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2015