Legal Opinion · Dissent

Thiel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 28, 2015No. 14-CA-879Published

1DissentJohnson, J.

hi respectfully disagree with sustaining State Farm’s exception of no right of action. I would overrule the exception of no *379right of action and address the merits of the issues raised on appeal.

An exception of no right of action tests whether the party seeking relief has a real and actual interest in the action. Hood v. Cotter, 08-0215 (La.12/2/08); 5 So.3d 819, 829. The function of the exception of no right of action is to determine whether the party belongs to the class of persons to whom the law grants the cause of action asserted. Id. An exception of no right of action assumes there is a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Copenhaver v. John Bonura & Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
  2. John Bonura & Co. v. Southern Pacific Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
  3. General William C. Westmoreland, Ambassador Richard Helms v. Cbs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
  4. Touchard v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  5. American Home Building Co. v. SlateLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API