Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. White Plains Oil & Gas Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 18, 1923PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Allen Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the 'Court by

Chief Justice Sampson—

Affirming.

The sole question presented by this appeal is whether a lessor of lands to be explored and developed for oil and gas on a royalty basis may have a cancellation of the lease contract on the grounds that the lessee is not producing oil and gas, or either, in paying quantities from'the leasehold. The lessor does not seek relief because the lessee did not within a reasonable time after notice from the lessor so to do, proceed with development for the purpose'of finding and producing more oil but merely upon the theory that the appellee…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kies v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  2. Bay State Petroleum Co. v. Penn Lubricating Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905
  3. Enfield v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Warfield Natural Gas Co. v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  2. Fremont Lumber Co. v. Starrell Petroleum Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. United States v. 2,847.58 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situated in Bath, Counties, Commonwealth of Kentucky (Ernest F. Brackmier)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
  4. Swiss Oil Corp. v. RiggsbyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  5. Gregory v. Sohio Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API