Legal Opinion

Forssenius v. Harman

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided October 12, 1964No. Civ. A. 3897, 3898PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALBERT V. BRYAN, Circuit Judge.

Since the adoption of the 24th Amendment forbidding exaction of a poll tax as a prerequisite to voting in a Federal election, * Virginia has enacted an additional qualification for the Federal voter. If he has not paid the poll tax still required in State elections, he must file within the same time a certificate of continuing residence. No such certificate is demanded of a voter in an election for the Virginia House of Delegates. By Article I, Section 2 and by the 17th Amendment of the United States Constitution, it is ordained that electors choosing a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YarbroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Lassiter v. Northampton County Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Guinn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Pope v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. Breedlove v. SuttlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Alwin E. Hopfmann v. Michael Joseph ConnollyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
  2. Gray v. JohnsonDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1964
  3. Moffett v. TraxlerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API