Legal Opinion
Mangat v. Snohomish County
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided August 26, 2013No. Nos. 67712-8-I; 68739-5-IPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Spearman, A.C.J.
¶1 Nothing in RCW 58.17.033 or ch. 30.70 of the Snohomish County Code (SCC) grants those who have filed permit applications to develop real property a vested right to “process” the application independent of an ownership interest in the land. As such, we reject Khushdev and Harbhajan Mangat’s argument that the hearing examiner and the trial court decisions, which allowed property owners Luigi Gallo and Johannes and Martha D ankers to move forward with a development application the Mangats originally filed, amounted to a taking of the Mangats’ private property. Affirmed.
FACTS
¶2…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Whatcom County v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. WatsonWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Marincovich v. TarabochiaWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. ElginWashington Supreme Court · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hood Canal Sand And Gravel v. Peter GoldmarkCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016