Legal Opinion

Estate of Kandall

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1955PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, C. J.

The trial court concluded that the $12,000 check was not intended as a testamentary disposition or gift, and the respondent does not base his claim to the $12,000 upon any theory of gift either inter vivos or causa mortis. The claim advanced by respondent is that the check was written to pay him “for labor,” namely, uncompensated services- rendered by respondent to decedent during the years from 1934 to March, 1945, and from September, 1946, to September, 1953.. The circumstances surrounding the writing of the check and the instructions of the deceased to his attorney are found in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Meginnes v. McChesneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  2. Estate of BreitzmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Howard v. DrexlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  4. Murray v. Estate of CornellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ramsey v. EllisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Ramsey v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
  3. In Re Estate of HuberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API