State v. Lumsden
Supreme Court of Missouri
1DissentWelliver, Judge
I respectfully dissent from the result and holding of the principal opinion that a defendant may not question a juror on voir dire concerning the juror’s definition of “reasonable doubt” for any purpose. Also, I respectfully disagree with the views of Bardgett, C. J., expressed in his dissenting opinion filed herein that a defendant may question a juror on voir dire concerning the juror’s definition of “reasonable doubt” for the purposes of formulating both challenges for cause and peremptory challenges.
While I agree that a party cannot use a juror’s preconceived definition of “reasonable…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Miles v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- State v. LasleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
- State v. GranberrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.