Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Lumsden

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 14, 1979No. 61478Published

1DissentWelliver, Judge

I respectfully dissent from the result and holding of the principal opinion that a defendant may not question a juror on voir dire concerning the juror’s definition of “reasonable doubt” for any purpose. Also, I respectfully disagree with the views of Bardgett, C. J., expressed in his dissenting opinion filed herein that a defendant may question a juror on voir dire concerning the juror’s definition of “reasonable doubt” for the purposes of formulating both challenges for cause and peremptory challenges.

While I agree that a party cannot use a juror’s preconceived definition of “reasonable…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Miles v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. State v. LasleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  4. State v. GranberrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  5. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API