Legal Opinion

Bowen v. Hughes

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1892No. 648PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from, Superior Court, Snohomish County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbar, J.

The motion to strike the statement of facts and dismiss the appeal in this case must be overruled. *443It would be inequitable, in our opinion, and not in harmony with the spirit of the law, to compel a party desiring to appeal to prepare his statement of facts before he had access to the judgment from which he desired to appeal. The mere oral announcement by the judge of his decision in the case is not, or at least might not be, a sufficient basis upon which to prepare a statement of facts, and appellant would have no right of access to the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Olcott v. BynumSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Lehman v. LewisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
  3. Jackson ex dem. Erwin v. MooreNew York Supreme Court · 1827
  4. Coles v. Allen, Freer & IllgesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  5. Merket v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Carkonen v. AlbertsWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Croup v. DeMossWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Richeson v. CrawfordIllinois Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Womach v. SandygrenWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Herriford v. HerrifordWashington Supreme Court · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API