Nance v. Anderson Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before BEnET, J., Anderson, March, 1901. Claim by R. Y. H. Nance against Anderson County for fees as probate judge in proceedings in lunacy. From order disallowing claim, he appeals to Circuit Court. From order reversing disallowance, county appeals. cite: Con., art. III., sec. 34, subs, io, n and 12; 59 S. C., 110; 1 Ency., 2 ed., 927. Mr. Tribble cites: 59 S. C., no; art. III., sec. 34, subs. 10, n and 12, Con.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Gary.
The facts out of which this controversy arose are set forth in the order of his Honor, the Circuit Judge, which is as follows: “The above cause came up before me on appeal at this, the March term of Court, 1901, on exceptions to the action of the county commissioners. It appears that the appellant is probate judge for Anderson County, and filed with the board of county commissioners an account for the sum of five dollars, for proceedings in lunacy to be audited and approved by said board. The board rejected said claim on the ground…
2Cited by9 opinions
- State v. HammondSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
- Gamble v. Clarendon CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
- State Ex Rel. Schroder v. BurnsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1906
- Senn v. Spartanburg CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
- Buist v. City Council of CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.