Luke v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Justice.
1. The evidence authorized the conviction of rape.
2. The testimony of the husband of the female, giving the details of a statement made by her regarding the alleged crime, was not inadmissible a's irrelevant or hearsay, the evidence showing that the statement was made to the witness immediately upon his going to his wife’s rescue in response to her calls for help, and that it was so closely connected with the alleged offense as to be admissible as a part of the res gestae. Conoway v. State, 171 Ga. 782 (156 S. E. 664); Conoway v. State, 49 Ga. App. 311 (2) (175 S. E. 391).…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Futch v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
- Lampkin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
- Conoway v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
- Hudgins v. Bloodworth & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Grant v. HartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Overton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
- Pierce v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
- Ruff v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Worthy v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.