Legal Opinion

United States v. Ladonta Gill

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 31, 2016No. 14-3205 & 15-1198PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KANNE, Circuit Judge.

Defendants-Appellants Ladonta Gill and Dana Bostic both pled guilty to participating in a heroin distribution conspiracy. Gill challenges his sentence as procedurally unsound, disputing his criminal history point assessment and supervised release conditions. Bostic challenges his sentence as procedurally unsound and substantively unreasonable. We vacate and remand Gill’s sentence for complete resentencing, and we affirm Bostic’s sentence.

I. Background

Gill was a high-level member of the New Breeds street gang and associated large heroin distribution operation controlled by…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Peugh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. United States v. Parrish KappesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  4. Michael Moore v. Lisa MadiganCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  5. United States v. Domingo BlountCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. United States v. Valerie FloresCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  2. United States v. Jaimie PankowCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  3. United States v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  4. United States v. David BridgewaterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  5. United States v. Kyle PaganCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API