Gotleib v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
McNEILLY, Justice:
Defendant was convicted by a Superior Court jury of violating 11 Del.C. § 1361(1), by recklessly selling obscene material, and of two counts of violating 11 Del.C. § 1361(4), by recklessly possessing obscene material for purposes of sale or other commercial dissemination. 1 On appeal, defendant contends that the Trial Court erred in denying his motion to suppress a film which police seized without a warrant and that admission of the film into evidence prejudi-cially tainted the other evidence, requiring reversal of his conviction on all three counts. Defendant also contends…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Paris Adult Theatre I v. SlatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Smith v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Roaden v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sisson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
- Marine v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992
- Hughes v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
- State v. HuddlestonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1980
- MacOn v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.