PRESCOTT v. OKLAHOMA CAPITOL PRESERVATION COMMISSION
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Per curiam
T1 Oklahoma citizens Bruce Prescott, James Huff, and Cheryl Franklin (complainants) seek removal of a Ten Commandments monument from the Oklahoma Capitol grounds. The monument was a gift from another Oklahoma citizen and was placed on the Capitol grounds pursuant to a Legislative act that was signed by the Governor, 'While conceding that no public funds were expended to acquire the monument, complainants nonetheless maintain its placement on the Capitol grounds constitutes the use of public property for the benefit of a system of religion. Such governmental action is forbidden by Article 2,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Van Orden v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Draper v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Haynes v. CaporalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Lepak v. McClainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- DRUMMOND v. OKLAHOMA STATEWIDE VIRTUAL CHARTER SCHOOL BOARDSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2024
- DRUMMOND v. OKLAHOMA STATEWIDE VIRTUAL CHARTER SCHOOL BOARDSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2024
- ODOM v. PENSKE TRUCK LEASING CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- ODOM v. PENSKE TRUCK LEASING CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- ODOM v. PENSKE TRUCK LEASING CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.