Pittman v. Gifford-Hill & Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
HAMITER, Judge.
Plaintiff, a resident of Stamps, Arkansas, seeks damages herein for injuries alleged to have been sustained by him and his automobile as the result of a collision between the said vehicle, which he was driving, and a work train owned and operated by the Louisiana & Arkansas Railway Company and Gifford-Hill & Company, Inc. Those made defendants are the named companies, Frank Moore, the train’s engineer, and the Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company. The latter is the alleged liability insurer of Gifford-Hill & Company, Inc.
According to the allegations of the petition, the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. SaiaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
- Gibbs v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
- Barnhill v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
- Martin v. Yazoo M. R. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1938
- Aaron v. MartinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- West v. RaySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1946
- Arata v. Orleans Capitol Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
- Bolton v. North River Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1958
- Eggleston v. Louisiana & A. Ry. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1939
- Bergeron v. Greyhound CorporationLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1958
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.