Legal Opinion

Pittman v. Gifford-Hill & Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 8, 1939No. 5895PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMITER, Judge.

Plaintiff, a resident of Stamps, Arkansas, seeks damages herein for injuries alleged to have been sustained by him and his automobile as the result of a collision between the said vehicle, which he was driving, and a work train owned and operated by the Louisiana & Arkansas Railway Company and Gifford-Hill & Company, Inc. Those made defendants are the named companies, Frank Moore, the train’s engineer, and the Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company. The latter is the alleged liability insurer of Gifford-Hill & Company, Inc.

According to the allegations of the petition, the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. SaiaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
  2. Gibbs v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
  3. Barnhill v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
  4. Martin v. Yazoo M. R. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Aaron v. MartinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. West v. RaySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1946
  2. Arata v. Orleans Capitol Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
  3. Bolton v. North River Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Eggleston v. Louisiana & A. Ry. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. Bergeron v. Greyhound CorporationLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1958

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API