Legal Opinion
Gooden v. Texaco, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 23, 1966No. 195 of 1964, 151 of 1965PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
CLARY, Chief Judge.
These cases having been heard and upon submission of Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law by the parties, the Court makes the following
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Libellant is a seaman in the United States Merchant Marine.
2. Texaco, Inc., respondent in No. 195 of 1964 in Admiralty, and impleaded respondent in No. 151 of 1965 in Admiralty, is a corporation which owned and/or operated the SS. TEXACO MISSISSIPPI, engaged in interstate or foreign commerce, at all times material herein.
3. Sinclair Refining Company, respondent in No. 151 of 1965…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Vaughan v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Jones v. Waterman SS CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
- Loverich v. Warner Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- Corden E. Yates v. Rodney H. Dann, Ruby M. Dann and R. H. Dann Towing and Lighterage CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
- The Federal No. 2Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Andrew C. Gooden, Jr. v. Sinclair Refining Company v. Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- Gore v. Maritime Overseas CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1966