Legal Opinion

United States v. Hendricks

District Court, D. Idaho

Decided February 2, 2018No. Case No. 1:16–cr–146–BLWPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtB. Lynn Winmill, Chief Judge

INTRODUCTION

The United States Sentencing Guidelines were designed to promote the twin goals of uniformity and proportionality in sentencing. The task was not easy to achieve, and efforts have continued to identify and eliminate sources of unwarranted disparities in federal sentencing. I write here to join several colleagues in expressing my belief that the methamphetamine Guidelines contain one such unwarranted disparity.1 Due to increases in the average purity of methamphetamine sold today, purity is no longer an accurate indicator of a defendant's culpability or role in a drug enterprise,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Spears v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Scott CarnellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  2. United States v. RodriguezDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2019
  3. United States v. Scott CarnellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API