Legal Opinion

Pena-Muriel v. Gonzales

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided June 13, 2007No. 05-1937PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIPEZ, Circuit Judge.

Noting that a court has now vacated the criminal conviction on which his removal proceedings were premised, Fredy Hugo Pena-Muriel asks us to vacate the Bureau of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision refusing to reopen his removal proceedings. Pena-Muriel argues that a change in immigration law or, alternatively, principles of due process require such a reopening, even though he left the country before he petitioned the government to reopen his deportation proceedings. We reject his arguments and deny the petition for review.

I

Pena-Muriel, a native and citizen of Bolivia,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Reno v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Barnhart v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DohertySupreme Court of the United States · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. William v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
  2. Marin-Rodriguez v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  3. Prestol Espinal v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  4. Ovalles v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  5. Xue Yong Zhang v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API