Longfellow v. McGregor
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by one of defendants from an order of the district court lor Hennepin county, Hicks, J., denying a motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the Court
START, O. J.2
The defendant William McGregor, on August 1, 1890, borrowed of the firm of Longfellow & Russell, which was com■posed of the plaintiff and Edward Russell, the sum of $2,200, and ■executed a note and mortgage on real estate to Russell to secure •such loan, and, as further security, effected fire insurance on the house upon the mortgaged premises for $2,500, payable in case of loss to Russell, as mortgagee.
In the month of October, 1890, the house was destroyed by fire, .and the loss was adjusted at $1,175.14, payable in 00 days, and a ■draft for the then present worth of this…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Anderson v. ReardonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Triggs v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Longfellow v. McGregorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rouse v. Detroit Electric RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- O'Brien v. Illinois Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
- Mohawk Co. v. Bankers Surety Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
- Greer v. Equity Co-Operative ExchangeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Satterlee v. LawlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.