Legal Opinion
Moore v. Emerson
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided May 21, 1895PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Appeal from the Balls Circuit Court. — Hon. Reuben E. Roy, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtBond, J.
Plaintiff sues for the breach of an express warrant in the sale to him by defendant of an imported jack, claiming damages at $1,207.50. The answer of defendant is a general denial, and a plea of mutual rescission and determination of the contract in consideration of the sale by defendant of a second jack at a reduced price.
On the trial, plaintiff gave evidence tending to show that he purchased the jack for $1,100 in cash, at which time defendant executed a written warranty, to wit:
“Bowling Oreen, Mo., Sept. 20, 1892.
“This is to certify that I have this day sold to Andrew Moore, of Charleston,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mandel v. ButtlesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
- Bowman v. ClemmerIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
- Fondren v. DurfeeMississippi Supreme Court · 1860
- McCormick & Bro. v. DunvilleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
- Martin v. MaxwellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Denver Horse Importing Co. v. SchaferSupreme Court of Colorado · 1914
- Thomas China Co. v. C. W. Raymond Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1905
- J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. BadgerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
- Burns v. LimerickMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
- Tower v. PaulyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1896
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.