Legal Opinion
Samsung SDI Co. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 28, 2006No. Civil Action 05-1680PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER OF COURT
AMBROSE, Chief Judge.
SYNOPSIS
Defendants seek a transfer of this patent infringement action to a more convenient forum under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). Defendants contend that litigating this action in California, where the parties are engaged in other litigation concerning similar patents, would be more convenient both to the parties and witnesses and would best serve the interests of justice. Plaintiff wants the litigation to remain here. After careful consideration, I will deny the Motion.
OPINION
Plaintiff Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. (“SDI”) holds numerous patents relating to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- George Jumara and Evangelina Jumara, H/w v. State Farm Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Shutte v. Armco Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Plum Tree, Inc. v. StockmentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Ricoh Co., Ltd. v. Honeywell, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
- EVCO Technology & Development Co. v. Precision Shooting Equipment, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Behalf v. Am. Airlines Grp., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Dariz v. Republic Airline Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Dietgoal Innovations LLC v. Wegmans Food Markets, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2013
- Dietgoal Innovations LLC v. Sweetgreen, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Harrison Keesler v. Tractor Supply CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2025
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.