People v. Sparks
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWood, Acting P. J.
Appellant and Fred Coman were accused in an indictment of the crime of burglary. The charge was dismissed as to defendant Coman on motion of the district attorney in order that he could be a witness for the prosecution. At a trial before the court without a jury appellant was found guilty. This appeal is prosecuted from the judgment of conviction and from the order denying a motion for a new trial.
For a number of years appellant was employed by Sears, Roebuck & Company as a salesman in the sporting goods de partment of their Hollywood store. He devised a scheme whereby he procured other…
2Cited by6 opinions
- People v. DeptulaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- People v. MinerviniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- People v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- People v. TimsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- People v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.