Nielsen v. Archdiocese of Denver
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BABCOCK, Chief Judge.
These cases, removed here from Colorado courts and consolidated for the purpose of resolving the plaintiffs’ motions to remand, present the narrow question whether claims arising out of neutral, state law of general applicability create a contested and substantial federal issue sufficient to establish jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 where, notwithstanding the existence of ecclesiastical recourse, secular norms govern the conduct of which the plaintiffs complain. For the reasons stated below, I find and conclude that no federal-question jurisdiction exists.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & ManufacturingSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Turner v. Roman Catholic DioceseSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
- Steward Software Co. v. KopchoColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
- Pressl v. Appalachian Power Co.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2015
- Angelo v. Board of County Commissioners of Jefferson County, Colorado, TheDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2024
- Annette Martin v. Ignacio Cruz-Mendoza, Total Quality Logistics, LLC, Searing Industries Wyoming, Inc., Monique Trucking, LLC, and Intsel Steel-West, LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2026
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.