Legal Opinion

State Of Washington v. Andrew P. Mathers

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 10, 2016No. 47523-5Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed Washington State Court of Appeals Division Two May 10, 2016 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 47523-5-II Respondent, v. ANDREW PATRICK MATHERS, PUBLISHED OPINION Appellant. MELNICK, J. — To an indigent defendant saddled with legal financial obligations (LFOs), it does not matter if the LFOs are labeled mandatory or discretionary. The effects on the indigent defendant remain the same. However, until there are legislative amendments or Supreme Court changes in precedent, we must recognize these distinctions and adhere to the principles…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Baxstrom v. HeroldSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Fuller v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. State v. BlazinaWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  4. In re the Detention of TurayWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. In re the Detention of ThorellWashington Supreme Court · 2003

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API