Legal Opinion
Wade v. Terhune
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 2, 2000No. Nos. 98-16720, 98-16738PublishedCited by 106 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
California state prisoners Daniel Adam Wade and Paul Christopher Buckley (“petitioners”) appeal the district court’s denial of their petitions for habeas corpus, in which they challenge their convictions for multiple counts of assault upon a police officer with a firearm. Petitioners assert that the prosecutor in their joint criminal trial exercised a peremptory challenge to exclude an African-American from the jury in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, and that the state trial court erred in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- People v. WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Georgia v. McCollumSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- William George Bonin v. Arthur Calderon, as Warden of San Quentin State Prison James Rowland, Director of the California Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- People v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by106 opinions
- Johnson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Leif Taylor v. Thomas M. Maddox, Interim Director George Galaza Cal TerhuneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- People v. BoyetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Anton E. Barker v. Gary FlemingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Oloth Insyxiengmay v. Richard MorganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.