Legal Opinion

Kallsen v. Big Horn Harvestore Systems, Inc.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided August 18, 1988No. 86CA1315PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

REED, Judge.

Plaintiffs, Richard A. and Carol Kallsen, and their attorney, E. Gregory Martin, appeal from an order of the district court holding that Martin’s attorney’s lien does not include costs advanced by him on behalf of the Kallsens. We reverse.

Plaintiffs obtained a judgment against Big Horn Harvestore Systems, Inc., and A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc. Big Horn did not appeal from the judgment and deposited the full amount of the judgment against it with the clerk of the district court. Attorney Martin filed a notice of attorney’s lien pursuant to § 12-5-119, C.R.S. (1985 RepLVol.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fillmore v. WellsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
  2. Collins v. ThuringerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1933
  3. In Re Marriage of RosenbergColorado Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Apa v. Qwest Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API