Legal Opinion
In Re Marriage of Rosenberg
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided August 16, 1984No. 83CA1038PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ENOCH, Chief Judge.
Cate Rosenberg appeals the entry of judgment on a motion for judgment on an attorney’s lien in favor of Plaut & Lipstein, P.C., a law firm. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
The firm represented appellant in the dissolution of marriage action. After a dispute arose over the firm’s final billing for services, the firm filed a motion for judgment on an attorney’s lien pursuant to the charging lien statute, § 12-5-119, C.R.S. After trial to the court, the court entered judgment for the amount claimed by the firm after certain adjustments were made, and awarded it an…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fillmore v. WellsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
- Miller v. Carnation CompanyColorado Court of Appeals · 1973
- Sentinel Acceptance Corporation v. ColgateSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
- Miller v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964
- Gee v. CrabtreeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. MarsColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
- In Re the Marriage of BerklandColorado Court of Appeals · 1988
- Matter of Estate of BenneySupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- In Re Printcrafters, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1997
- People v. BrownSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.